Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Meters. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and Peoples Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The place off connection into the person mating. Review of Standard Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An effective. (2002). Internet contradiction revisited. Diary from Personal Factors, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites paradox: A social tech you to definitely minimizes societal wedding and you will psychological better-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, Roentgen.M., & Industries, J. Meters. (2001). Count, time, and you may time of marriage ceremonies and you may divorces. Most recent Society Records, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).

Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional studies away from closeness, hobbies, and union: Research the latest assumptions of your triangular idea from love. Emotional Records, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step 3.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Feeling most readily useful regarding carrying out tough: Social contrasting within romantic dating. Journal out of Character and Public Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The fresh new implicit cognition regarding personal competition. Journal regarding Personality and you will Personal Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.

A good. (2001)mitment and you will dating maintenance elements

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you’re able to glamorous possibilities: The new evolved mindset away from dating repair. Evolution and you can Peoples Choices, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential investigation regarding dispute and agreement inside disappointed and you may nondistressed marital lovers. Record out of Asking and Scientific Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. A good., Environmentally friendly, A beneficial. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Dating formation online: What’s the huge appeal? Diary out-of Public Products, 58(1), 9–30.

The benefits of confident illusions: Idealization therefore the build from satisfaction in the romantic relationship

Neff, L. Good., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-analysis objectives within the romantic relationships: A type of worldwide enhancement and certain confirmation. Into the P. Noller & J. A great. Feeney (Eds.), Knowledge ents regarding examination of couple communications (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge School Drive.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the client-counselor thread from the contact lens regarding attachment theory. Psychotherapy: Principle, Research, Practice, Studies, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & venezuelansk brude Gardner, W. L. (2005). The brand new societal keeping track of program: Enhanced susceptibility in order to social signs because an adaptive response to societal exception to this rule. Into the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh personal outcast: Ostracism, public exclusion, rejection, and you will intimidation (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Psychology Drive.

Enter, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Around the world and you will certain relational designs in the exposure to societal affairs. Journal away from Identification and you may Social Therapy, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. Good., Tran, S., ). Accessory and recommendations trying in intimate dating. Personality and you can Personal Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you may specific connection representations from inside the adulthood: Can there be a love?. Diary Regarding Personal And personal Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. From inside the J. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate close matchmaking: Repair and you can enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An effective. D. (2000). Projection actually effect certainly partners because the a function of new similarity in their shared event. Character And you will Social Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience away from extrinsic advantages for the taste and loving. Log away from Identification and you may Personal Psychology, 38(3), 453–460.